ArticleJSES international2025
Gender bias in glenosphere size selection in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Glenoid size correlates with height and weight, not just gender.
Article in JSES international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restoration of shoulder kinematics during active throwing after the Latarjet procedure in anterior shoulder instability: A dynamic radiostereometric study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Advancements in Inlay Glenoid Components for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optimal glenosphere selection is critical for successful outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). This study primarily aimed to determine patient-specific variables associated with dimensions of native glenoid anatomy. Secondarily, we aimed to determine the distribution of glenosphere sizes selected in male and female patients with similar-sized glenoids. Methods: Computed tomography scans from patients undergoing rTSA with a diagnosis of cuff arthropathy or irreparable cuff tears were included for analysis. Variables collected included the following: age, gender, height, weight, and glenosphere size. Glenoid dimensions were measured, and interobserver reliability was calculated. Correlation coefficients were calculated for all variables. Multivariate predictive regression models were utilized to determine correlations between patient variables and glenoid width and height. Results: One hundred and eighteen patients (46% male, 54% female) were included for analysis. Taller and male patients were significantly associated with increased glenoid height ( Discussion: Patient gender and height are significantly associated with glenoid height and width. There remains a strong tendency towards gender bias when selecting glenosphere sizes for patients undergoing rTSA with similar-sized glenoids. This data highlights the importance of considering patient height as well as gender when considering glenoid component size in the setting of rTSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.