Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182232›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2025

Autonomous Powered Ankle Exoskeleton Improves Foot Clearance and Knee Hyperextension After Stroke: A Case Study.

Kai Pruyn, Rosemarie Murray, Lukas Gabert, Tommaso Lenzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kai PruynDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and the Utah Robotics Center, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA; Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3805-4202
Rosemarie MurrayDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and the Utah Robotics Center, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
Lukas GabertDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and the Utah Robotics Center, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA; Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5569-9099
Tommaso LenziDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, the Utah Robotics Center, and the Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA; Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84111 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0957-6412

Funding

CTSA Postdoctoral T32 at University of Utah: Spheres of Translation Across the Research Spectrum (STARS) Training ProgramT32TR004394 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANGELA FAGERLIN, Keke Celeste Fairfax · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS T32 TR004394NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemiparetic gait is often characterized by ankle weakness, resulting in decreased propulsion and clearance, as well as knee hyperextension. These gait deviations reduce speed and efficiency while increasing the risk of falls and osteoarthritis. Powered ankle exoskeletons have the potential to address these issues. However, only a handful of studies have investigated their effects on hemiparetic gait. The results are often inconsistent, and the biomechanical analysis rarely includes the knee or hip joint or a direct clearance measure. In this case study, we assess the ankle, knee, and hip biomechanics with and without a new autonomous powered ankle exoskeleton across different speeds and inclines. Exoskeleton assistance resulted in more normative kinematics at the subject's self-selected walking speed. The paretic ankle angle at heel strike increased from 10° plantarflexed without the exoskeleton to 0.5° dorsiflexed with the exoskeleton, and the peak plantarflexion angle during swing decreased from 28° without the exoskeleton to 12° with the exoskeleton. Furthermore, stance knee flexion increased from 7° without the exoskeleton to 20° with the exoskeleton. Finally, foot clearance increased with the exoskeleton for all conditions between 3.1 cm and 5.4 cm. This case study highlights new mechanisms for powered ankle exoskeletons to improve hemiparetic gait.

Indexed as

prosthetics and exoskeletonsRehabilitation roboticswearable robotics

Identifiers

PMID40182232
PMCPMC11967734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.