Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182195›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Neuro-affirmative support for autism, the Double Empathy Problem and monotropism.

Mark Brosnan, Louis John Camilleri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark BrosnanCentre for Applied Autism Research (CAAR), University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Louis John CamilleriDepartment for Inclusion and Access to Learning, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conceptualising autism within a neurodiversity approach raises fundamental questions regarding the nature of the goals pursued in autism support and who is responsible for achieving these goals. The Double Empathy Problem considers deficits in social communication as residing between autistic and non-autistic communicators, rather than solely within the autistic individual. This is important as autistic individuals can have different perceptions of what appropriate goals for autism support should be, when compared to (non-autistic) family, friends and professionals. Monotropism highlights the importance of engaging with the interests of the autistic individual when considering support. This perspective considers the extent to which autistic individuals can self-set and self-achieve autism support goals? Social narratives have a specific goal and explicit description of how to achieve this goal and what the outcome of achieving the goal will be. The Stories Online For Autism app (SOFA-app.com) develops and delivers social narratives for autistic individuals. The SOFA-app has proven to be highly acceptable and effective in supporting autistic individuals. Initially our research focussed on family, friends and professionals developing autism support for autistic children. Subsequently we extended this methodology to explore the self-set goals of autistic adults and children as well as capacity to self-achieve these goals successfully. Digital support for the development and delivery of social narratives to support self-set goals for autistic individuals is recommended. Addressing the Double Empathy Problem and supporting self-set goals are also considered alongside the implications of preferences associated with Monotropism to argue this approach can be considered neuro-affirmative.

Indexed as

autismdigital social narrativesdouble empathy problemmonotropismneuro-affirmative support

Identifiers

PMID40182195
PMCPMC11966444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.