ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Insights from DCE-MRI: blood-brain barrier permeability in the context of MS relapses and methylprednisolone treatment.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical Review of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Applications in Cerebral Physiology.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Review
- Blood-brain barrier permeability in relation to disease severity and timing of multiple sclerosis diagnosis in optic neuritis.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Detecting multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses remains challenging due to symptom variability and confounding factors, such as flare-ups and infections. Methylprednisolone (MP) is used for severe relapses, decreasing the number of contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI. The influx constant (K Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of K Methods: We studied 20 RRMS subjects admitted for possible relapse, using DCE-MRI on admission to assess K Results: Superior predictive accuracy was demonstrated with the inclusion of EBL and K Conclusion: These results support the use of K
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.