Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182081›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2025

The Microchimerism Literature Atlas.

Michael Christian Gruber, Daniel Kummer, Katja Sallinger, Henderson James Cleaves, Arsev Umur Aydinoğlu, Thomas Kroneis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael Christian GruberDivision of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Daniel KummerDivision of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5576-8945
Katja SallingerDivision of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Henderson James CleavesDepartment of Chemistry, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.
Arsev Umur AydinoğluResearch Center for Science and Technology Policies, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Thomas KroneisDivision of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Centre, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-9340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Microchimerism Literature Atlas (MCLA) is a comprehensive online dataset to facilitate the investigation of microchimerism (MC), condition where individuals harbor cells from another individual of the same species. The MCLA provides access to more than 15 000 references from MC research, covering peer-reviewed articles and reviews from 1970 to the present. Key features include a multidimensional search function and logical operators for assembling search queries. The MCLA dataset offers a clearly structured data table view, combined with dynamic graphical data representation and visual citation analysis, aiding in the investigation and identification of research trends and patterns. The MCLA supports data export in various formats and receives regular updates. The MCLA is being developed as an essential resource for the MC research community while its framework is easily adaptable for custom literature datasets, enabling its use in other research fields.

Indexed as

bibliographic databasecitation analysisLiterature atlasmicrochimerismresearch toolresearch trend visualization

Identifiers

PMID40182081
PMCPMC11967202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.