ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
A prognostic model based on autophagy-and senescence-related genes for gastric cancer: implications for immunotherapy and personalized treatment.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress of siRNA Nanomedicines in Modulating the Microenvironment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a gene signature for gastric cancer prognosis based on propionate metabolism.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanism paradoxes to precision therapeutics.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The process of human aging is accompanied by an increased susceptibility to various cancers, including gastric cancer. This heightened susceptibility is linked to the shared molecular characteristics between aging and tumorigenesis. Autophagy is considered a critical mediator connecting aging and cancer, exerting a dynamic regulatory effect in conjunction with cellular senescence during tumor progression. In this study, a combined analysis of autophagy- and senescence-related genes was employed to comprehensively capture tumor heterogeneity. Methods: The gene expression profiles and clinical data for GC samples were acquired from TCGA and GEO databases. Differentially expressed autophagy- and senescence-related genes (DEASRGs) were identified between tumor and normal tissues. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were carried out to provide insights into biological significance. A prognostic signature was established using univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses. Furthermore, consensus clustering analyses and nomograms were employed for survival prediction. TME and drug sensitivity analyses were conducted to compare differences between the groups. To predict immunotherapy efficacy, the correlations between risk score and immune checkpoints, MSI, TMB, and TIDE scores were investigated. Results: A fourteen-gene prognostic signature with superior accuracy was constructed. GC patients were stratified into three distinct clusters, each exhibiting significant variations in their prognosis and immune microenvironments. Drug sensitivity analysis revealed that the low-risk group demonstrated greater responsiveness to several commonly used chemotherapeutic agents for gastric cancer, including oxaliplatin. TME analysis further indicated that the high-risk group exhibited increased immune cell infiltration, upregulated expression of ICs, and a higher stromal score, suggesting a greater capacity for immune evasion. In contrast, the low-risk group was characterized by a higher proportion of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cases, an elevated TIDE score, and a greater TMB, indicating a higher likelihood of benefiting from immunotherapy. In addition, Single-cell sequencing demonstrated that TXNIP was expressed in epithelial cells. Cellular experiments preliminarily verified that TXNIP could promote the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells. Conclusion: This study presents a robust predictive model for GC prognosis using autophagy- and senescence-related genes, demonstrating its ability to predict immune infiltration, immunotherapy effectiveness, and guide personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.