ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Translating the multifaceted use of liquid biopsy to management of early disease in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted Therapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Current Advances and Challenges.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of research trends and future directions in early detection of pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Tumor microenvironment phenotyping guides precision therapy in unresectable pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Molecular Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Prognostication of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, primarily due to late stage at diagnosis. This review examines the multifaceted applications of liquid biopsy and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in the diagnosis and management of PDAC. We review the current literature on the technological advancements in liquid biopsy analysis such as next generation sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) as well as multi-omics technologies, highlighting their potential for accurate molecular subtyping through ctDNA analysis. This review highlights the significant role of ctDNA in the assessment of tumor behavior, disease subtyping, prediction and monitoring of treatment response, and evaluation of minimal residual disease. We discuss the implications of integrating liquid biopsy techniques into clinical practice as well as its challenges and limitations. By drawing insights from recent studies, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how liquid biopsy and ctDNA analysis can enhance early disease management strategies in PDAC. We underscore the need for additional prospective studies and clinical trials to validate its feasibility and accuracy in order to establish clinical utility, with the ultimate goal of routine incorporation into practice to improve patient outcomes and transform the treatment landscape for PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.