Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182010›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025

Chitin estimation in agricultural soils.

Alex Gobbi, Roberto Lava, Giorgia Vianello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Chitin estimation in agricultural soils.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex Gobbi
Roberto Lava
Giorgia Vianello

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present scientific report has been elaborated in the context of the European Commission mandate requesting for an opinion according to Article 23(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 regarding the approved plant protection uses of chitosan and chitosan hydrochloride as basic substances. This scientific report focused on estimating the amount of chitin present in an average agricultural soil, aiming to establish a baseline for its natural availability. Understanding the source and concentration of biotic chitin in soil assisted the estimation of chitosan potentially available in the environment, as requested in one of terms of reference of the concerned EC mandate. Chitin in soil was estimated to range from 27 to 280 kg/ha in the first 0-5 cm layer and 99 to 901 kg/ha in the 0-20 cm layer. Fungi are the main chitin producer followed by insects and nematodes. Soil crustaceans could not be considered in the assessment due to the lack of necessary information and the variability of their presence. The development of a polynomial function to estimate the amount of chitin in such biome can also identify the main predictors of chitin content in similar biomes. This estimate was based on the available scientific literature, and it would require additional validation using field measurements and error analysis on different soil types and conditions, to become a generalised model. Lack of information alongside related uncertainties have also been identified.

Indexed as

agricultural soilbasic substancechitinchitosannatural occurrenceplant protection

Identifiers

PMID40182010
PMCPMC11966557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.