ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery for pediatric solid abdominal tumors: a single-center 10-year experience.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent therapeutic robotic-assisted surgery as the next frontier of precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized oncological surgery with benefits such as smaller incisions and quicker recovery. However, its use in pediatric population is debated due to concerns about complete tumor resection and complications. Robotic surgery, offering enhanced visualization and precision, may address these issues. This study reviews a decade of robotic surgery for pediatric solid abdominal tumors at a single center, assessing perioperative and oncological outcomes. Methods: This prospective, single-arm study involved patients aged over six months, treated between 2013 and 2023 for solid abdominal tumors. Exclusion criteria included weight <6 kg, distant metastasis, and tumors >6 cm in shortest diameter. All patients underwent thorough preoperative assessment, including imaging and multidisciplinary evaluation. Surgeries were performed using the da Vinci Si Surgical System and data on patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up were systematically collected. Results: The study cohort included 20 patients (9 boys and 11 girls) with a median age of 3.5 years. The median operative time was 114 min, with a median hospital stay of 3 days. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 10% of cases. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, with a satisfactory lymph node sampling. Median follow-up of 5 years showed overall survival and event-free survival rates of 90%. Conclusion: Robotic surgery for pediatric abdominal tumors is safe and effective, reducing blood loss and hospital stays without compromising oncological outcomes. Proper case selection and adherence to oncological principles are essential. Further multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize the use of robotic surgery in pediatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.