Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Evaluation of safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of inactivated reverse-genetics-based H5N8 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus vaccine with various adjuvants via parenteral and mucosal routes in chickens.

Kairat Tabynov, Aidana Kuanyshbek, Leila Yelchibayeva, Kuantay Zharmambet, Zauresh Zhumadilova, Gleb Fomin, Nikolai Petrovsky, Olaitan C Shekoni, Gourapura J Renukaradhya, Kaissar Tabynov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kairat TabynovInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Aidana KuanyshbekInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Leila YelchibayevaInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Kuantay ZharmambetInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Zauresh ZhumadilovaCentral Reference Laboratory, M. Aikimbayev National Scientific Center for Especially Dangerous Infections, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Gleb FominCentral Reference Laboratory, M. Aikimbayev National Scientific Center for Especially Dangerous Infections, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Nikolai PetrovskyVaxine Pty Ltd, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Olaitan C ShekoniCenter for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Food Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University (OSU), Wooster, OH, United States.
Gourapura J RenukaradhyaCenter for Food Animal Health, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Food Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University (OSU), Wooster, OH, United States.
Kaissar TabynovInternational Center for Vaccinology, Kazakh National Agrarian Research University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Highly pathogenic H5Nx avian influenza (HPAI) poses a significant threat to poultry health globally, necessitating the development of effective vaccination strategies. Methods: This study assessed the immunogenicity and efficacy of a reverse-genetics-derived, Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals (DIVA)-compatible inactivated H5N8 vaccine based on the IDCDC-RG71A strain. The vaccine was formulated with different adjuvants, including Montanide ISA 78 VG, ISA 71 R VG, GEL P PR, and mannose-conjugated chitosan nanoparticles, and administered via either the subcutaneous (SC) or intranasal (IN) route. To evaluate safety, the vaccine was tested in specific antibody negative (SAN) chickens, showing no adverse effects. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers, antigen-specific IgA and IgY levels, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation. Vaccine efficacy was determined through a challenge study using a field isolate of H5N1. Results: This showed that a single SC dose of vaccine containing ISA 78 VG or ISA 71 R VG provided the best efficacy against infection, with high survival rates, control of abnormally high temperature incidence, reduced virus shedding, and reduced lung and liver lesions. The ISA 78 VG-adjuvanted SC vaccine induced the highest HI titers and CD4+ T cell proliferation, while ISA 71 R VG and GEL P PR elicited the strongest IgY responses. In contrast, IN formulations induced IgA in the lungs and trachea however, even after two doses, failed to generate high HI titers and provided poor, if any, protection against infection. This highlights the superior efficacy of the SC over the IN route of vaccination for reducing H5N1 viral shedding. Conclusion: These results underscore the importance of both the adjuvants and delivery route to maximize HPAI vaccine efficacy. This presented system could thereby be used to develop potent and DIVA-compatible vaccines to enhance biosecurity and disease management in regions affected by endemic HPAI.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineImmunogenicity, VaccineInfluenza A Virus, H5N8 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsInfluenza VaccinesAdministration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChickensInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypePoultry DiseasesVaccinationVaccine EfficacyVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvants, ImmunologicAdjuvants, VaccineAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivatedadjuvantsavian influenzaH5N8nanoparticlesreverse genetics; efficacyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID40181968
PMCPMC11965622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.