Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181911›Full record

ArticleThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa2025

Changes in cannabis use post decriminalisation in mental health care users in South Africa.

Rachel Moshori, Lisa Galvin, Laila Paruk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel MoshoriDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0761-1752
Lisa GalvinDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5910-5451
Laila ParukDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9691-9892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Personal cannabis use was decriminalised in South Africa in 2018. Cannabis use increases the risk of mental illness (MI) and worsens prognosis in patients with MI. The impact of decriminalisation on cannabis use remains unclear. Aim: To examine cannabis use patterns by self-report and urine multidrug screening (UMDS) among psychiatric inpatients at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH). Setting: CHBAH, Soweto, South Africa. Methods: A retrospective review of clinical records comparing patients admitted to CHBAH psychiatry pre- and post-decriminalisation. Results: A total of 244 patients were included, with 57% using cannabis based on self-report and/or UMDS. Although not significant, overall cannabis use was higher post-decriminalisation (63.1%) than pre-decriminalisation (50.8%). Self-reported use increased slightly post-decriminalisation (56.6% vs. 50.0%), while UMDS-confirmed use was significantly higher (32.8% vs. 17.2%). Cannabis use was associated with male gender and younger age, with younger admissions post-decriminalisation. Conclusion: Decriminalisation did not significantly increase overall or self-reported cannabis use; however, more patients tested positive on UMDS post-decriminalisation. Young males remain at higher risk of cannabis use.

Indexed as

cannabisdecriminalisationmental healthpsychiatric admissionspsychotic disordersSouth Africasubstance use

Identifiers

PMID40181911
PMCPMC11966661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.