Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181894›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Psychometric evaluation and community norms of the GAD-7, based on a representative German sample.

Sören Kliem, Cedric Sachser, Anna Lohmann, Dirk Baier, Elmar Brähler, Jörg M Fegert, Harald Gündel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sören Kliem *Department of Social Welfare, Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena - University of Applied Sciences, Jena, Germany.
Cedric Sachser *Department for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Anna Lohmann *Department of Social Welfare, Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena - University of Applied Sciences, Jena, Germany.
Dirk BaierInstitute of Delinquency and Crime Prevention, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elmar BrählerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Jörg M FegertDepartment for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Harald GündelDepartment of Medical Psychology and Sociology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale is widely used to assess generalized anxiety symptoms in both clinical and general populations. However, updated psychometric evaluations and population norms for the German adult population are lacking. This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the GAD-7 and provide representative population norms. Methods: A representative sample of the adult population in Germany (N = 2,519) was assessed. Item characteristics (means, standard deviations, inter-item correlations) were examined. Construct validity was evaluated through correlations with the PHQ-9 and BSI-18. Internal consistency was assessed using coefficient omega. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to test the one-factor model, and measurement invariance across gender and age was examined using multi-group CFA. Results: The GAD-7 demonstrated strong internal consistency and construct validity. CFA supported the assumed one-factor model. Measurement invariance analyses indicated that the GAD-7 provides comparable measurements across gender and age groups. Updated population-based norms were established for the total sample and specific age groups. Discussion: Findings confirm the GAD-7 as a psychometrically sound measure for generalized anxiety in the general population. The updated norms enhance its applicability in clinical and epidemiological research, supporting its use for screening and assessment across diverse demographic groups.

Indexed as

GAD-7generalized anxietymeasurement invariancepopulation normspsychometricsself-report questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID40181894
PMCPMC11967371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.