ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2025
Hindi translation and validation of perinatal grief scale (short version): Assessing grief following stillbirth in bereaved mothers.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perinatal grief is the experience or emotions of parents following the loss of an infant by miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal loss, or elective termination for fetal anomalies. Aim: We aimed to translate and adapt the Perinatal Grief Scale (PGS) into Hindi and evaluate its psychometric properties in a sample of women who had recently experienced a stillbirth. Method: The PGS was translated and adapted into Hindi following the process of translation and adaptation recommended by the World Health Organization. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were carried out to assess discriminant validity and composite reliability. Additionally, the participants were assessed on four other questionnaires (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire) to test the convergent validity. Results: The mean age of the participants was 27.57 years (SD = 4.42), and 7% of the mothers were of advanced age. The Cronbach's alpha of the three subscales of PGS was more than 0.85, which confirms the reliability of PGS-H. A significant positive correlation was found between PGS-H and scores of STAI, EPDS, GAD7, and PHQ9 ( Conclusion: The PGS-H has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing grief in women following pregnancy loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.