ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2025
A randomized sham-controlled trial to study the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on craving, abstinence, and time to relapse in severe alcohol use disorder.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient and public involvement in Indian mental health trials: Reflections on CONSORT 2025 and the path ahead.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neural circuitry-based treatments, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have demonstrated efficacy in reducing craving in individuals with alcohol use and other addictive substances. Aim: The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tDCS on craving, time taken to first drink, and relapse to drinking over 3 months among individuals with severe alcohol use disorder. Methods: A randomized sham-controlled trial included adults aged 18-55 years with severe alcohol dependence. Participants (n = 149) were abstinent from alcohol for at least 3 days, underwent a benzodiazepine washout, and exhibited active craving. tDCS was administered twice daily for 5 consecutive days, with bilateral stimulation being given by placing the anode over F3 and the cathode over F4 to the 'active' (A) and 'sham' (S) intervention groups. Clinical parameters were assessed at baseline, 1 month (1 m), and 3 months (3 m). Results: At completion, out of the 149 randomized subjects (n (A) =75, n (S) =74), 107 participants (n (A) =51, n (S) =56) received the intended tDCS sessions. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Intention-to-treat analysis showed significantly lower craving scores in group A than in group S at 1 month and 3 month follow-up time points in comparison to the baseline (baseline: A = 48.33 ± 1.94, S = 48.27 ± 2.45; 1 m: A = 30.37 ± 11.66, S = 33.55 ± 13.73; 3 m: A = 28.50 ± 13.23, S = 34.75 ± 14.07; F (2,294) = 5.52, Conclusion: Adjunctive tDCS demonstrated efficacy in reducing craving and preventing relapse in individuals with severe alcohol dependence. These findings suggest the potential of tDCS as a therapeutic intervention for severe alcohol dependence which is less intense in terms of resources and time and can further be tailored to monitor neurobiological correlates in recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.