ReviewFrontiers in allergy2025
Scratching the surface: biomarkers and neurobiomarkers for improved allergic contact dermatitis management.
Review in Frontiers in allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anti-Inflammatory Therapies for Atopic Dermatitis: A New Era in Targeted Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Neuroimmune Axis in Atopic Dermatitis: From Pathogenic Mechanisms to Targeted Neuroimmunotherapy.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Integrated Multi-Omics Analyses Reveal Innovative Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets Associated with Atopic Dermatitis.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Eczema: etiology, subtypes, therapeutic approaches and socioeconomic impact.Frontiers in allergy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), also known as allergic eczema, is a common inflammatory skin disorder that affects millions of Americans and imposes significant physical, psychological, and economic burdens. Differentiating ACD from other forms of dermatitis remains a challenge, with patch testing as the gold standard. Despite its utility, patch testing can lack diagnostic accuracy, highlighting the importance of molecular biomarkers to refine diagnosis and treatment. Advances in transcriptomics and machine-learning have enabled the identification of biomarkers involved in ACD, such as loricrin (LOR), ADAM8, CD47, BATF, SELE, and IL-37. Moreover, biomarkers such as LOR, NMF, and TEWL, may have prognostic value in evaluating therapeutic response. Emerging neurological biomarkers (neurobiomarkers), including IL-31 and TRPV1, target pathways involved in the pruritic and inflammatory responses, offering novel therapeutic targets as well. This mini review summarizes current ACD treatments, biomarkers for targeted therapies, and emphasizes the role of neurobiomarkers in ACD treatment. Additional research on the validity of the therapeutic potential of these biomarkers is necessary to improve ACD treatment and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.