ArticleArthritis care & research2025
Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Resilience Coaching for Youth With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Pediatric Rheumatologists' Perspectives.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePromoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) is a resilience coaching program designed for adolescents with chronic illness. We aimed to examine the perceived feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of PRISM among pediatric rheumatologists treating adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain and obtain recommendations for improvement to inform future implementation efforts.
methodsWe performed semistructured interviews with pediatric rheumatologists across several US institutions. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Hybrid inductive-deductive coding was employed to capture emergent themes, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0, and develop the codebook. We performed double coding for 20% (n = 2) of the transcriptions to develop the codebook and ensure interrater reliability.
resultsTen pediatric rheumatologists were interviewed, and feedback on PRISM was uniformly positive in terms of perceived clinical value and favorability for local implementation. Perceived facilitators included PRISM's brevity, remote delivery, and the potential for a peer group session. Finding the funding and having enough staff for such a program as well as the concerns around competing demands and building PRISM into adolescents' busy schedules were the primary perceived barriers for implementation.
conclusionPediatric rheumatologists report that PRISM would be valuable and of interest to their patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, and the resilience coaching program could be further augmented by the addition of a peer support component. Implementation strategies are needed to support program costs and staffing to effectively deliver and sustain the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.