ReviewFuture science OA2025
Tracking protein kinase targeting advances: integrating QSAR into machine learning for kinase-targeted drug discovery.
Review in Future science OA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery of novel acridine based inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) via pharmacophore modeling and machine learning-driven virtual screening followed by molecular dynamic studies.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Review
- Cutting-edge developments in computer-aided anti-HIV drug design.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning in kinase inhibitor development: advances, challenges, and future prospects.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Conceptual density functional theory in drug discovery: an overview.Journal of molecular modeling · 2025Review
- Protein-Ligand Docking Simulations for Drug Discovery.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based automated detection of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma in histopathology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein kinases are vital drug targets, yet designing selective inhibitors is challenging, compounded by resistance and kinome complexity. This review explores Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling for kinase drug discovery, focusing on integrating traditional QSAR with machine learning (ML)-CNNs, RNNs-and structural data. Methods include structural databases, docking, and deep learning QSAR. Key findings show ML-integrated QSAR significantly improves selective inhibitor design for CDKs, JAKs, PIM kinases. The IDG-DREAM challenge exemplifies ML's potential for accurate kinase-inhibitor interaction prediction, outperforming traditional methods and enabling inhibitors with enhanced selectivity, efficacy, and resistance mitigation. QSAR combined with advanced computation and experimental data accelerates kinase drug discovery, offering transformative precision medicine potential. This review highlights deep learning-enhanced QSAR's novelty in automating feature extraction and capturing complex relationships, surpassing traditional QSAR, while emphasizing interpretability and experimental validation for clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.