ArticleMedical physics2025
Out-of-field neutron radiation from clinical proton, helium, carbon, and oxygen ion beams.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shielding assessment for multi-ion radiotherapy based on ion-specific dose-defined workloads.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fluorescent nuclear track detectors for out-of-field neutron dosimetry in proton therapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a silicon carbide P-N diode for thermal neutron detection in a radiotherapy LINAC.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Out-of-field neutron radiation from clinical proton, helium, carbon, and oxygen ion beams.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn hadron therapy, out-of-field doses, which may in the long-term cause secondary cancers, are mostly due to neutrons. Very recently, PURPOSE: The focus of this article is to compare secondary neutron doses produced by clinical protons,
methodsAmbient dose equivalent, H*(10), measurements were performed, with five types of rem counters, of the neutron field produced by the four primary ions impinging on a water phantom. This experiment was performed at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) in the framework of the activities of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS). The experimental data are normalized to both unit primary particle and target dose, and are further compared to Monte Carlo (MC) simulations performed with the FLUKA and MCNP codes.
resultsThe intensity of the neutron field increases with ion mass, and the trend is more significant in the forward direction. The minimum H*(10) for all ions, 5µSv/Gy to 10µSv/Gy, was measured in the transverse and backward directions, whereas the maximum measured value was about 1.3 mSv/Gy for primary
conclusionThe four extended-range instruments provide reliable and consistent results, whereas the conventional rem counter underestimates H*(10) in a neutron field with a large high-energy component. FLUKA and MCNP provide consistent predictions, within a factor of 1.6 for the downstream position and lower differences in the other cases, and are in agreement with the experimental data. It was found that under certain conditions neutrons do not represent the only secondary radiation field to be monitored; the presence of charged particles affects the performance of moderator-type neutron detectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.