Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181695›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2025

Survival after cessation of immunotherapies in melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kristine E Mayer, Lydia Warburton, Anne Zaremba, Sarah Preis, Yannick Foerster, Tilo Biedermann, Oana-Diana Persa

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Survival after cessation of immunotherapies in melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Cancer survivorship in malignant melanoma.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristine E MayerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0044-5347
Lydia WarburtonCentre for Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Anne ZarembaDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sarah PreisDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1830-3830
Yannick FoersterDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5383-2263
Tilo BiedermannDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
Oana-Diana PersaDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1469-4464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy elicits durable responses in a subset of patients with advanced melanoma. However, the appropriate timing for treatment cessation remains an unresolved issue. Moreover, some patients are required to discontinue therapy due to the occurrence of severe adverse events. Upon treatment cessation, a subset of patients maintains a durable response, while some patients relapse and require rechallenge with ICI. Criteria for a safe stop of ICI have not been established.

objectivesThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the durability of response in melanoma patients who discontinued ICI therapy. Furthermore, the outcome of patients who electively stopped therapy was compared to that of patients who discontinued therapy due to adverse events.

methodsMEDLINE/PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting outcomes after ICI discontinuation in patients with advanced melanoma. Pooled 1- to 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using random-effects models. The impact of the reason for treatment discontinuation, therapy regime and treatment duration on relapse-free survival was evaluated.

resultsTwenty studies including 1832 patients were analysed. The pooled 1- and 3-year PFS rates after therapy stop were 86% (95% CI 80%-91%) and 71% (95% CI 64%-77%). A significantly higher 1-year PFS rate was observed in patients who electively discontinued treatment in contrast to toxicity-related therapy cessation (91% vs. 79%). Longer ICI treatment was associated with a higher PFS rate. 1- and 3-year OS rates post ICI treatment discontinuation were 96% (95% CI 91%-99%) and 86% (95% CI 79%-92%).

conclusionsMost patients remained relapse-free after ICI treatment. Patients with a treatment duration of at least 2 years are ideal candidates for treatment cessation, while treatment discontinuation may be considered after at least 1 year of ICI. PROSPERO number: CRD42024543781.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsWithholding TreatmentHumansImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40181695
PMCPMC12553132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.