ReviewExpert review of hematology
The challenges of iron chelation therapy in thalassemia: how do we overcome them?
Review in Expert review of hematology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Management of Thalassemia: A Perspective on Current Standards and the Emergence of FDA-Approved Oral Therapy.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Thalassaemia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Utility of Native T1 Mapping for the Evaluation of Myocardial Iron Overload in Patients with Thalassemia Major.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Gamification-Based Interventions for Treatment Adherence and Self-Management in Pediatric Chronic Diseases: A Scoping Review with Implications for Thalassemia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Dynamic OGTT-Derived Indices Outperform Fasting HOMA-2 for Detecting Dysglycemia in Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- New Approaches and Strategies for the Repurposing of Iron Chelating/Antioxidant Drugs for Diseases of Free Radical Pathology in Medicine.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPacked red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions are the primary treatment for thalassemia. However, chronic transfusions ultimately result in iron overload, causing heart, liver, and endocrine complications along with other comorbidities. Although iron chelation is routinely initiated to remove excess iron, adherence remains a challenge, and iron overload still contributes to significant morbidity and early mortality in thalassemia. AREAS COVERED: We review the evidence for iron overload and its complications in thalassemia. We also assess iron chelation strategies with possible adherence challenges categorized as patient-, medication-, and system-related barriers. Evidence suggests that lower adherence rates have been associated with more endorsed barriers. Further, patient-related barriers could be internal or external, and taking a patient-centered approach is key to addressing these challenges. Choosing the right iron chelator could help overcome some medication-related barriers. Finally, insurance coverage and access to specialized centers could affect initiation of iron chelation. EXPERT OPINION: A critical and routine assessment of adherence barriers is key to optimizing patients' adherence to iron chelation. Adherence is often a multifactorial process, and it varies over time. Shared decision making with patients and/or caregivers is an important next step to improving adherence to iron chelation, and ultimately health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.