ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2025
How to democratize cell and gene therapy: A global approach.
Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Emerging trends and research hot spots in inborn error of immunity: A bibliometric perspective.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Translational Progress and Clinical Challenges in Bioengineered Bone and Joint Repair.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Harnessing the Power of CAR-NK Cells for Solid Tumors: Challenges, Innovations, and Future Frontiers in Immunotherapy.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026Review
- Clearing the hurdles for CAR-T cell treatment.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025Article
- Getting closer to hemophilia gene therapy for all?Blood advances · 2025Article
- Cord Blood-Derived Platelet Gel in Wound Healing: From Biological Rationale to Clinical Application.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past 25 years, the field of cell and gene therapy has grown substantially, with almost 50 therapies approved in the United States to treat severe, often life-threatening diseases. Despite clinical successes, the high costs and complex manufacturing and delivery requirements of cell and gene therapies (CGTs) present significant challenges to their broad use and equitable access. Disparities in access to CGTs range from financial constraints to infrastructure limitations and regulatory hurdles. As CGT trials expand globally, innovative strategies are needed to address these inequities, including alternative manufacturing models, harmonizing regulatory requirements, and innovative payment structures to replace the high up-front cost of current treatments. Addressing barriers like lack of infrastructure-stem cell processing and specialized personnel, for example-will be necessary to increase global CGT access and requires a multi-stakeholder approach. Academic, pharmaceutical, government, and nonprofit entities must cooperate to develop a more sustainable model for CGTs. Additionally, new university-led and public-private partnerships aim to facilitate access in underserved populations. To achieve equitable global access, a comprehensive strategy must involve innovative manufacturing, education, regulatory alignment, and stakeholder engagement, while ensuring that CGTs are both accessible and affordable to those who would benefit most from them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.