ArticleBMC health services research2025
Development of a national Distress Brief Intervention: a multi-agency service to provide connected, compassionate support for people in distress.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health problems, self-harm and suicide are major public health concerns. Following national strategic commitments to improve the response and follow-up support for adults in Scotland presenting to frontline services in emotional distress, this study describes the development of the first national Distress Brief Intervention, a multi-agency service to provide connected, compassionate support for people in distress.
methodsThe six step Intervention Mapping protocol was used to account for the complexity of the intervention and to guide development, testing and implementation. Data/information sources comprised: literature and evidence review; delivery partner and stakeholder consultations (n = 19); semi-structured interviews and/or focus-groups with frontline services staff experienced in responding to distress (n = 8); interviews and/or focus groups with adults with experience of distress (n = 9); feedback from test training for staff (n = 16); self-assessed confidence ratings provided by staff immediately before and following training (n = 388).
resultsWe developed a time-limited, two-level, complex intervention for adults experiencing emotional distress, provided by 'frontline' statutory services (primary and acute healthcare, police, ambulance) and third-sector community organisations in Scotland. Intervention components included competency-based training programmes for staff, information, protocols and guidance for providers, personalised distress management planning and behaviour change tools. During the development phase, 525 intervention providers (n = 472 frontline statutory service staff; n = 53 third-sector community organisation staff) completed training programmes in four pilot areas in Scotland. Training evaluations from 388 providers (74%) indicated significantly greater confidence following training on key competencies.
conclusionsA multi-agency national Distress Brief Intervention was systematically developed and implemented in a range of non-specialist frontline and community settings in Scotland. Up-take of training and evaluations of training indicate it is highly acceptable to potential providers and improves key competencies. Following independent evaluation, the Distress Brief Intervention has been rolled out nationally across the whole of Scotland, and has significant potential as a model of care and prevention internationally, including countries with low statutory health resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.