Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181455›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Creation and validation of a roadside rescue skills scale for training pre-hospital medical teams: the RoadRes-Q scale.

Killien Lavabre, Nicolas Marjanovic, Denis Oriot, Mathilde Chenu, Adrien Gransagne, Michel Gentilleau, Anthony Moreau, Paul Contal, Olivier Mimoz, Bertrand Drugeon and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Killien LavabreService des urgences adultes et SAS 86 / SMUR, CHU de Poitiers, 2 rue de la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers Cedex, France.
Nicolas MarjanovicService des urgences adultes et SAS 86 / SMUR, CHU de Poitiers, 2 rue de la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers Cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-1175
Denis OriotABS Lab, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Mathilde ChenuService des Urgences et SAMU, Hôpital Saint Louis, La Rochelle, France.
Adrien GransagneService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours 86, Chasseneuil du Poitou, France.
Michel GentilleauService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours 86, Chasseneuil du Poitou, France.
Anthony MoreauService Départemental d'Incendie et de Secours 86, Chasseneuil du Poitou, France.
Paul ContalService des urgences adultes et SAS 86 / SMUR, CHU de Poitiers, 2 rue de la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers Cedex, France.
Olivier MimozService des urgences adultes et SAS 86 / SMUR, CHU de Poitiers, 2 rue de la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers Cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1737-7915
Bertrand DrugeonService des urgences adultes et SAS 86 / SMUR, CHU de Poitiers, 2 rue de la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers Cedex, France. Bertrand.DRUGEON@chu-poitiers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-7975
Road Rescue Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoad traffic injuries are the leading cause of death among young people worldwide. While advances in vehicle safety have reduced some of the risks, the speed and quality of pre-hospital care are critical to prevent fatalities. In France, patients are cared for by medical teams and firefighters who must work together as closely as possible to ensure the best possible survival rate. However, there is a lack of standardised scales to assess the performance of these multidisciplinary teams. This study aimed to create and validate a roadside rescue skills assessment scale, the RoadRes-Q scale, for healthcare teams.

methodsWe used a two-round Delphi method to develop the RoadRes-Q scale. A panel of 9 international roadside rescue experts, including 7 firefighters and 2 engineers in road rescue equipment, agreed to participate. The scale covers five key areas: healthcare provider protection, site securing, vehicle securing, first aid delivery, and patient extrication. The final version was tested during two one-day simulation-based training sessions, each involving 22 participants: 6 healthcare staff, 14 firefighters, and 2 simulated victims. Assessors completed the scale during and after each scenario, focusing on internal consistency and inter-observer reliability.

resultsThe RoadRes-Q scale consists of 60 items. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha of 0.86), indicating that items were non-redundant and consistently measured the required competencies. However, inter-observer reliability was low (intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.48), suggesting variability between assessors. Satisfaction among participants to the simulation-based training courses was high, and their knowledge increased.

conclusionsThe RoadRes-Q scale proved to be a valid and reliable scale for evaluating both technical and non-technical skills. While internal consistency was strong, improvements are needed in inter-observer reliability. Structured training for assessors and video-based assessments could enhance reproducibility. The RoadRes-Q scale has the potential for assessing the quality and safety of care provided by healthcare teams in roadside rescue situations. REGISTRATION: As the study did not involve interventional research or patient participation, ethics committee approval was not required, but it received approval from the scientific referents of the Faculty of Medicine of Poitiers, and participants provided informed consent for using their anonymised data.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficClinical CompetenceEmergency Medical ServicesPatient Care TeamRescue WorkAdultDelphi TechniqueFemaleFirefightersFranceHumansMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40181455
PMCPMC11966812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.