ArticleSystematic reviews2025
Comparative efficacy of exercise, nutrition, and combined exercise and nutritional interventions in older adults with sarcopenic obesity: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of Physical Exercise with and Without Nutritional Supplementation on Serum Albumin in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomolecules · 2026Pooled it
- Exercise and Nutrition for Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Analysis by Population Characteristics.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Sexual Dimorphism in Clinical Manifestations of Knee Osteoarthritis.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of sarcopenic obesity detection and associated mental-cognitive outcomes in community-dwelling older adults: impact of using body mass index versus waist circumference.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Metabolic and Inflammatory Biomarkers Predicting Sarcopenic Obesity and Cardiometabolic Risk in Arab Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Research trends in nutrition and exercise for sarcopenic obesity: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenic obesity (SO) in older adults is associated with certain adverse outcomes, including falls, fractures, and disability, all of which affect patient quality of life, represent an economic burden, and potentially enhance the risk of death. Although a number studies have examined the effects of exercise, nutrition, and combined exercise and nutritional interventions on older adults with SO, the optimal therapeutic approach has yet to be sufficiently established. In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) protocol for SO in older adults, we aim to compare the combined effects of exercise and nutrition with those of exercise or nutritional interventions alone on the body composition and physical performance of older adults with SO.
methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, OVID, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases will be used to systematically search for randomized controlled trials published from the time of database inception to December 2024. Outcomes will include body composition and physical performance, and data will be extracted independently by two researchers. In cases of disagreement, a consensus will be reached by consulting a third researcher. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be used to assess randomized controlled trials, and data analysis will be performed using Stata 15.0 and R software, based on homogeneity, sensitivity, transitivity, consistency, and publication bias tests. DISCUSSION: By comprehensively assessing the relative efficacies of exercise, nutrition, and combined interventions in older adults with SO, we aim in this systematic review and NMA to fill an important gap in the existing literature. These findings will provide a reference for healthcare providers and policymakers and facilitate the development of evidence-based guidelines that will contribute to optimizing SO management and gaining more favorable outcomes for this vulnerable population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42024504706.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.