SynthesisHead & face medicine2025
Accuracy of artificial intelligence in caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-assisted training for proximal caries diagnosis by undergraduate dental students: a randomized experimental study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Clinician-accessible automated machine learning in oral healthcare: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Development of Leading Enhancement Assistive Planning: A three-dimensional malocclusion classification system for orthodontic treatment with clear aligners.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Dental Caries Detection Across Clinical Imaging Modalities: A Systematic Review and Descriptive Synthesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Human-AI Collaboration in Proximal Early Caries Lesion Detection: Potential Benefits for Novices and Potential Risks for Experts.Caries research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: A Pilot Study of Caries Detection Accuracy and Instructor Agreement.Journal of dental education · 2026Article
- AI-informed healthcare pedagogy: a review of the literature and application to pedagogical practice informed by case studies from dental education.British dental journal · 2026Review
- Will Artificial Intelligence and Digital Impressions Erode the Art of Clinical Intuition?International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Classification of occlusal caries severity using spectrophotometric CIELAB measurements and machine learning algorithms.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Evaluating AI diagnostic accuracy in approximal dental caries detection on bitewing radiographs.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessment of posterior interproximal surfaces on bitewing and panoramic radiographs by dental interns and an artificial intelligence application.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Rethinking Diagnostic Performance Metrics in Imaging Artificial Intelligence: Lessons from Caries Detection on Radiographs.Caries research · 2026Review
- Lightweight Deep Learning for Automated Dental Caries Screening from Pediatric Oral Photographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emerging trends in the early diagnosis of dental caries: a scoping review of artificial intelligence, digital diagnostics, and teledentistry.Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Concise Review of Reporting Checklists and Guidelines.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Analytical validation of Smilo.ai: evaluating an AI-driven platform for automated oral health screening and global diagnostic accessibility.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Illuminating the invisible: translational biophotonics for contemporary caries detection and biological decision-making.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionArtificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed the diagnosis and treatment of dental caries, a prevalent issue in oral health care. Traditional diagnostic procedures such as eye inspection and radiography have limitations in detecting early-stage degradation. Artificial intelligence (AI) provides a viable alternative to improve diagnostic precision and effectiveness. This systematic review examines the diagnostic precision of artificial intelligence systems in identifying dental caries using X-ray images. METHODOLOGY: The literature search utilized electronic web resources such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Explore, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane. We conducted the search using specific MeSH key phrases and collected data up to January 2024. The QUADAS-2 assessment method was used to assess the risk of bias using a graph and a heat map. We conducted the statistical analysis using R v 4.3.1 software, which included the "meta," "metafor," "metaviz," and "ggplot2" packages. We displayed the results using odds ratios (OR) and forest plots with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsWe used a comprehensive search approach in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to find appropriate studies. The meta-analysis incorporates fourteen of the 21 articles included in this review. The research mostly uses convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for analyzing images, showing outstanding accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting caries. Significant variability in study results highlights the need for additional research to comprehend the components affecting AI effectiveness.
conclusionDespite challenges in implementation and data availability, this systematic review provides essential information about AI and shows great potential caries detection, improve diagnostic consistency, and ultimately enhance patient care in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.