Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181383›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2025

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapeutic, pharmacological, and combination treatments for non-suicidal self-injury in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Xinyi Chen, Yingying Dong, Mengfei Ye, Xiang Wang, Junwei Yan, Yiying Yao, Zhihua Qi, Chao Qian, Zheng Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewComparative StudyNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07450105 (Intensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Self-Harm and Suicidal Behavior in Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07450105 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Intensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Self-Harm and Suicidal Behavior in Youth: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled12ConditionsSelf-Harm, Deliberate, Suicidal Behavior, Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)ArmsIntensive Dialectical Behavior Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xinyi Chen *Department of Psychiatry, Shaoxing Seventh People'S Hospital (Affiliated Mental Health Center of Shaoxing University), Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Yingying Dong *Department of Psychiatry, Shaoxing Seventh People'S Hospital (Affiliated Mental Health Center of Shaoxing University), Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Mengfei Ye *Department of Psychiatry, Shaoxing Seventh People'S Hospital (Affiliated Mental Health Center of Shaoxing University), Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Behavioral Neurosciences, Science Research Center of Medical School, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Junwei YanDepartment of Behavioral Neurosciences, Science Research Center of Medical School, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Yiying YaoDepartment of Behavioral Neurosciences, Science Research Center of Medical School, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Zhihua QiThe Fifth People's Hospital of Zhuji, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Chao QianDepartment of Psychiatry, Shaoxing Seventh People'S Hospital (Affiliated Mental Health Center of Shaoxing University), Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China. qianchao5097@163.com.
Zheng LiuDepartment of Behavioral Neurosciences, Science Research Center of Medical School, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China. liuzheng1707@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a common and serious injury behavior in children and adolescents, however, its treatment remains controversial. Here, using network meta-analysis (NMA), we compared and ranked all available therapeutic treatment interventions to explore the best treatment strategy for NSSI in children and adolescents.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO for randomized controlled trials used to reduce the frequency of NSSI in children and adolescents from database inception until Jan. 11, 2025. Primary outcomes were efficacy and acceptability. We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) with credible intervals (CIs) in random effects models.

resultsWe included 28 trials comprising 6496 participants. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) was better than other interventions. In subgroup analysis, pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy significantly aggravated the frequency of NSSI in depression (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.14); however, these interventions significantly reduced NSSI in patients with self-harm (OR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.96). We also found that NSSI was significantly increased in the first 3 months when using SSRIs in treatment but was significantly reduced after 3 months.

conclusionPsychotherapy seems to be a better choice than pharmacotherapy, especially DBT. DBT was associated with a better reduction in the frequency of NSSI than treatment as usual, with high confidence of evidence. NSSI is frequently used to combat depression symptoms, suggesting that clinicians should pay greater attention to depression symptoms to reduce NSSI, especially in the first 3 months of treatment with SSRIs.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePsychotherapySelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentChildCombined Modality TherapyDialectical Behavior TherapyHumansAcceptabilityEfficacyNetwork meta-analysisNon-suicidal self-injuryPharmacotherapyPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40181383
PMCPMC11966835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.