ArticleBMC health services research2025
Life, death, and ethics: medical and dental students' attitudes on assisted dying in Austria.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- If it were me…. Austrian undergraduate medical students' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Sterbeverfügungsgesetz (StVfG) Austria's law on assisted dying, came into force on January 1, 2022. Since then, only limited research has examined the attitudes of medical and dental students in Austria toward assisted dying. To address this gap, a survey was conducted among medical and dental students at the Medical University of Vienna, as they represent potential future opinion leaders. Understanding their perspectives is essential for the effective implementation and future development of assisted dying within the public healthcare system.
methodsAn online survey was conducted between May and June 2023. The questionnaire included two open-ended questions designed to capture medical and dental students' personal reasons for and against assisted dying. Responses were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis and categorized into micro (individual), meso (institutional) and macro (societal) levels.
resultsOf 5526 eligible students, 337 responded (response rate 6.1%). Key arguments in favor of assisted dying included subjective considerations like autonomy, relief of suffering, and dying with dignity. Main counterarguments highlighted societal concerns such as potential misuse (e.g., inheritance fraud or murder), legal uncertainties, and financial reasons. Less focus was given to immediate social impacts like the psychological burden on medical staff.
conclusionsThe diverse perspectives reflect a spectrum of ethical and practical considerations. Incorporating assisted dying, along with its ethical and legal issues, into the medical curriculum is essential for fostering a comprehensive understanding. Moreover, ongoing debates indicate the need for a thorough review of the legal framework to address loopholes and consider potential revisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.