Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181367›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Machine learning-driven identification of key risk factors for predicting depression among nurses.

Xiaoyan Qi, Xin Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoyan QiSchool of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, No.15 Feicui Road, Hefei, 230601, China.
Xin HuangSchool of Management, Anhui University, Hefei, China. hxmic747@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-1928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in 2019, caused by SARS-CoV-2, the disease has become a global health threat due to its high infectivity, morbidity, and mortality rates. With China's comprehensive relaxation of pandemic control policies in 2022, the risk of infection for nursing personnel has further increased.

objectivesThis study aims to identify risk factors associated with depression among nursing staff during the full reopening of COVID-19 in China in 2022 and to construct a predictive model to assess the risk.

methodsFrom December 9, 2022, to April 6, 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted in three hospitals in Anhui Province, including 293 nursing staff. The research subjects were divided into a depression group and a non-depression group, and SPSS 23.0 software was used to analyze the data of both groups. We developed four predictive machine learning models: logistic regression, support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting machine (XGBoost), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost). The development and validation of these models utilized open-source Python libraries such as Scikit-learn and XGBoost. The models were trained and validated using a 10-fold cross-validation method, and the final model selection was based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsThe AUC values for the logistic regression, SVM, Logistic, XGBoost, and AdaBoost models were 0.86, 0.88, 0.95, and 0.93, respectively, with F1 scores of 0.79, 0.83, 0.90, and 0.89, respectively. The XGBoost model demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy. However, the study's findings are limited by the small sample size and single location, and further validation is needed to confirm the model's generalizability. The extreme gradient boosting machine model, tailored for common risk factors among Chinese nursing staff, provides a powerful tool for predicting the risk of depression.

conclusionThis model can assist clinical managers in accurately identifying and addressing potential risk factors during and after the full reopening of COVID-19. Since the working environment and stress factors faced by nursing staff may vary across different countries, the research findings from China can promote international exchange and cooperation in the management of mental health among nursing staff, advice future research should focus on larger, multi-center studies to validate the model's performance and explore additional risk factors. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable, because of this article belongs to cross-sectional study.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-sectional studyDepressionFull reopeningMachine learningPythonRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40181367
PMCPMC11969953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.