ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Development and prevalence of breastfeeding initiation in a tertiary obstetric center and its influencing factors.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infant feeding practices of Indian immigrant mothers and their association with sociodemographic factors: An Australia-wide cross-sectional survey.International breastfeeding journal · 2026Article
- Breastfeeding Attitudes and Their Associated Factors Among Chinese Nursing Undergraduates: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTertiary obstetric centers are responsible for the care of all their newborns and for supporting mothers during breastfeeding. The aim of this work is to analyze the development and prevalence of breastfeeding initiation in a tertiary obstetric center. Subsequently, factors influencing the initiation of breastfeeding will be investigated.
methodsThis is a retrospective study collecting data of all births of a non-selected cohort from 2017 to 2022 of singleton pregnancies at the Medical School of Hannover, Germany. Retrospective data of 16,092 women were used. We examined type of infant nutrition in our maternity unit in mothers by self-report, which was a routine survey conducted by a breastfeeding and lactation consultant within the framework of the perinatal quality assurance initiative. Secondly, factors impacting breastfeeding initiation were investigated (maternal BMI, gestational age, parity, special risk factors and birth mode) using a second cohort of 4,603 mother-child-pairs of live born, singleton full-term newborns.
resultsOver the observed period, the rate of ever breastfeeding women was 93% in 2017 and 83% in 2022 indicating decreased adherence to breastfeeding. The rate of exclusively breastfeeding at the breast decreased by 21% over observed period (from 78 to 57%). While the group of feeding infant formula only and breastfeeding cessation before discharge remained stable, the rate of supplementary feeding, and breastfeeding and feeding infant formula, increased significantly. The rate of exclusive breastfeeding at the breast was lower in the groups of obese compared to normal-weight women (59.1% vs. 78.2%), women undergoing a cesarean section in comparison to vaginal birth (62.3% vs. 78.1%) and deliveries at 38 weeks of gestation compared to 40 weeks of gestation (62.7% vs. 77.3%). The infants of women with diabetes mellitus (74.2% vs. 62%) or gestational diabetes (74% vs. 65%) were significantly more likely to require infant formula than those without risk factors.
conclusionsThose women with the potentially highest benefit of breastfeeding to not exert their potential for risk reduction. Adequate awareness among healthcare professionals is imperative to capitalize on the brief but substantial opportunity to influence breastfeeding behavior in a tertiary obstetric center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.