SynthesisBMC women's health2025
Optimal extension time after initial endocrine therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo and in silico approaches for evaluating nerolidol-β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles: Antioxidant potential and hormonal modulation in DMBA-induced mammary carcinoma.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Breast cancer survivorship in South Africa: A holistic primary care approach.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026Article
- Combined Pathological Response and PEPI Score Improves Long-term Prognostic Stratification in HR-positive Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal duration of extended endocrine therapy (ET) for women with hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) early-stage postmenopausal breast cancer remains uncertain. This meta-analysis systematically evaluated the optimal time to prolong aromatase inhibitors ( AIs) therapy for postmenopausal early stage breast cancer who received initial endocrine therapy.
methodsPubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, Scopus, EmBase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using keywords related to breast cancer, HR-positive, AIs, and tamoxifen (TAM). Disease-free survival (DFS) was used as the primary endpoint. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 and Revman 5.4 statistical software. Hazard ratio (HR) with its corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used as an effective indicator to assess DFS, OS, and subgroups of extended ET. Relative ratio (RR) was used to assess adverse events.
resultsThe study included four RCTs involving 8,748 patients with HR-positive breast cancer. Pooled data showed an improvement in DFS when extending endocrine therapy from 5 to 7-8 years (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73 ~ 0.93), especially in patients with tumor size ≥ 2 cm (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49 ~ 0.98), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67 ~ 0.89), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive or negative (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74 ~ 0.97; HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22 ~ 0.89) and previous chemotherapy (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68 ~ 0.95). However, DFS has not improved with the extension from 7-8 to 10 years (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.85 ~ 1.10). Furthermore, we found no significant difference in overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs) analysis revealed a significant increase in the incidence of arthralgia, osteoporosis, bone fractures and asthenia after extended AIs.
conclusionsThe proportion of patients with breast cancer receiving ET extended beyond 5 years has increased, while the extension of AIs treatment from 5 to 7-8 years may be an option for high-risk patients with well-tolerated tumor size ≥ 2 cm, HR-positive, and previous chemotherapy. However, a variety of adverse events may accompany ET therapy, the identification of factors that may benefit breast cancer patients requires further randomized controlled studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022335497.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.