ArticleBMC cancer2025
CausalCervixNet: convolutional neural networks with causal insight (CICNN) in cervical cancer cell classification-leveraging deep learning models for enhanced diagnostic accuracy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal Discovery in Observational Medical Research: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- From data to decision: integrating causality AI and predictive analytics in endourological practice-a descriptive guide for clinicians from EAU Endourology.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Application of multimodal data fusion and intelligent classification in medical coding with the MCoder-T model.PloS one · 2026Article
- Recent advancements in the application of artificial intelligence-based approaches for screening, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cervical cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- AI in Cervical Cancer Cytology Diagnostics: A Narrative Review of Cutting-Edge Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Attention-enhanced deep learning for cervical cytology: combining convolutional networks with multi-head attention and fuzzy logic.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a significant global health issue affecting women worldwide, necessitating prompt detection and effective management. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 660,000 new cases of cervical cancer and 350,000 deaths were reported globally in 2022, with the majority occurring in low- and middle-income countries. These figures emphasize the critical need for effective prevention, early detection, and diagnostic strategies. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have greatly enhanced the accuracy of cervical cancer cell classification and diagnosis in manual screening. However, traditional predictive approaches often lack interpretability, which is critical for building explainable AI systems in medicine. Integrating causal reasoning, causal inference, and causal discovery into diagnostic frameworks addresses these challenges by uncovering latent causal relationships rather than relying solely on observational correlations. This ensures greater consistency, comprehensibility, and transparency in medical decision-making. This study introduces CausalCervixNet, a Convolutional Neural Network with Causal Insight (CICNN) tailored for cervical cancer cell classification. By leveraging causality-based methodologies, CausalCervixNet uncovers hidden causal factors in cervical cell images, enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. The approach was validated on three datasets: SIPaKMeD, Herlev, and our self-collected ShUCSEIT (Shiraz University-Computer Science, Engineering, and Information Technology) dataset, containing detailed cervical cell cytopathology images. The proposed framework achieved classification accuracies of 99.14%, 97.31%, and 99.09% on the SIPaKMeD, Herlev, and ShUCSEIT datasets, respectively. These results highlight the importance of integrating causal discovery, causal reasoning, and causal inference into diagnostic workflows. By merging causal perspectives with advanced DL models, this research offers an interpretable, reliable, and efficient framework for cervical cancer diagnosis, contributing to improved patient outcomes and advancements in cervical cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.