Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181352›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2025

Mating from a female perspective: Do brown bear females play an active role in mate searching?

Vincenzo Penteriani, María Del Mar Delgado, Ilpo Kojola, Samuli Heikkinen, Ancuta Fedorca, Pino García-Sánchez, Mihai Fedorca, Slavomír Find'o, Michaela Skuban, Javier Balbontín and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vincenzo Penteriani *Department of Evolutionary Ecology, National Museum of Natural Sciences (MNCN), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain. v.penteriani@csic.es.
María Del Mar Delgado *Biodiversity Research Institute (IMIB, CSIC-Oviedo University-Principality of Asturias), Mieres Campus, 33600, Mieres, Spain.
Ilpo KojolaLUKE, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Ounasjoentie 6, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Samuli HeikkinenLUKE, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Ounasjoentie 6, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Ancuta FedorcaDepartment of Wildlife, National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry Marin Dracea, Closca Street 13, 500040, Brasov, Romania.
Pino García-SánchezDepartment of Wildlife, National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry Marin Dracea, Closca Street 13, 500040, Brasov, Romania.
Mihai FedorcaDepartment of Wildlife, National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry Marin Dracea, Closca Street 13, 500040, Brasov, Romania.
Slavomír Find'oCarpathian Wildlife Society, Námestie Slobody 18, 960 01, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Michaela SkubanCarpathian Wildlife Society, Námestie Slobody 18, 960 01, Zvolen, Slovakia.
Javier BalbontínDepartamento de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Edificio Verde, Avda. de Reina Mercedes s/n, 41012, Seville, Spain.
Alejandra Zarzo-AriasDepartamento de Biología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049, Madrid, Spain.
Daniele FalcinelliDepartment of Environmental Biology (DBA), Sapienza University of Rome, 5 Piazzale Aldo Moro, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Andrés OrdizDepartamento de Biodiversidad y Gestión Ambiental, Área de Zoología, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
Jon E SwensonFaculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.

Funding

Creșterea capacității și performanței instituționale a INCDS 'Marin Drăcea' în activitatea de CDI-CresPerfInst 34PFE/30 December 2021European Regional Development Fund ITMS 26220120069LIFE17NAT/IT/464 SAFE-CROSSING LIFE17NAT/IT/464 SAFE-CROSSINGMCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 PID2020-114181GB-I00Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation Nucleu Programme PN 23090304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited information exists on the active role of females during mate searching. Theory primarily focuses on male reproductive behaviours, suggesting male distribution follows that of females, while female distribution is influenced by food resources and habitat. This approach might underestimate the females' role in shaping mating strategies. Incorporating a female perspective into mating studies can enhance our understanding of evolutionary factors.

methodsUsing GPS data from brown bears Ursus arctos across Finland, Romania and Slovakia, we explored female movement behaviour during the mating period. First, we estimated movement speed, total distance and net distance at a daily scale. Then, we quantitatively described when the movement peaks occur by estimating two critical points of the functions described by each of the aforementioned movement parameters: (1) the point in time when the rate of change in brown bear movement behaviour is the highest; and (2) the point in time when each aspect of brown bear movement is most pronounced. We quantified temporal variations in male and female movements throughout the year using generalized additive mixed models, while we used linear mixed models to assess the relationship between peak movement parameters, bear sex and population.

resultsOur findings identified two overlooked behaviours: (1) male and female movement parameters showed the highest rate of change during the mating season, challenging the notion of male roaming as the primary mating strategy; and (2) females travelled the longest distances during the mating season, potentially seeking high-quality mates. This behaviour aligns with the strategy of engaging in copulations with multiple males to avoid infanticide.

conclusionsOur study reveals novel insights into the active role of female brown bears in mating strategies, challenging traditional male-centric views. These results support the need for detailed investigations into female behaviours across mammalian taxa, which offer potential to advance our understanding of mammalian social and mating systems. Local differences also underscore the importance of social and ecological conditions to explain variation in the female role in mating strategies.

Indexed as

FemalesInfanticideMating excursionsMating strategiesMovement ecologyRoaming–to–mateUrsus arctos

Identifiers

PMID40181352
PMCPMC11966790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.