ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Letter to the editor regarding "effect of buttress plate in herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study".
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this letter to the editor, we highlight several concerns that may affect the validity of the study results by Luo et al. entitled "Effect of Buttres plate in Herscovici type D vertical medial malleolar fractures and peripheral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study." First, we point out a methodological flaw in the selection of treatment groups, as insufficient standardization of criteria potentially led to selection bias. Second, we note that the angle of the screws in vertical fractures differed from the standard recommended in the literature, which may affect the effectiveness of fixation. Studies in the literature have increased the validity of their comparisons by using more reliable screw alignment techniques. They also recommend plate fixation instead of screws for vertical fractures, supporting the idea that plates provide more stable fixation in these cases. The inappropriate placement of screws in the Luo et al. study may therefore bias the results in favor of plate fixation and reduce the validity of the comparison between treatment modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.