ArticleBMC oral health2025
Accuracy of digital indirect bonding technology for customized orthodontic brackets based on personalized typodonts.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digitally Planned Orthodontic Tooth Movement in a Fully Customized Self-Ligating Lingual System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe chief aim of this study was to confirm the accuracy and repeatability of digital indirect bonding (IDB) by simulating customized clinical orthodontic procedures with personalized typodonts from the perspective of orthodontic outcomes.
methodsFive personalized typodonts were produced with 3D-printing technology to mimic straight-wire orthodontic procedures. The digital IDB was employed to position the customized brackets. After treatment, the PAR index, the ABO-OGS index and the occlusal contact area were analyzed. The matching degree between the target position and the posttreatment position on typodonts was assessed with Geomagic Control X.
resultsThe mean arch discrepancy between the personalized typodonts and the initial intraoral scan model was 0.15 mm ± 0.01 mm in the maxilla and 0.20 mm ± 0.01 mm in the mandible. Following customized orthodontic therapy, the PAR Index decreased from 29 to 1, the ABO-OGS Index was 13.8 ± 0.84, and the occlusal contact area increased 4.04mm
conclusionsDigital IDB is conducive to locating the brackets in the target position to precisely achieve the ideal therapeutic outcome of customized orthodontic systems on the personalized typodont. The customized bracket design and the digital IDB can lead orthodontics in a more accurate, visual, and predictable direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.