Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181337›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Predicting treatment response and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combination therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using a longitudinal CT-based radiomics model: a multicenter study.

Jun Xu, Junjun Li, Tengfei Wang, Xin Luo, Zhangxiang Zhu, Yimou Wang, Yong Wang, Zhenglin Zhang, Ruipeng Song, Li-Zhuang Yang and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jun XuAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
Junjun LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, People's Republic of China.
Tengfei WangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China. wangtf@cmpt.ac.cn.
Xin LuoYangtze Delta Region Institute (Huzhou) & School of Resources and Environment, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Huzhou, Chengdu, 313099, 611731, China.
Zhangxiang ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, People's Republic of China.
Yimou WangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
Yong WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College), Wuhu, 241001, People's Republic of China.
Zhenglin ZhangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
Ruipeng SongDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgerydivision of Life Sciences and Medicineanhui Province Key Laboratory of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Anhui Provincial Clinical Research Center for Hepatobiliary Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, the University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230001, People's Republic of China.
Li-Zhuang YangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
Hongzhi WangAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
Stephen T C WongDepartment of Systems Medicine and Bioengineering, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Hai LiAnhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China. hli@cmpt.ac.cn.

Funding

Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Plan 2023s07020001National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFB1300204the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82371931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying effective predictive strategies to assess the response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-based combination therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is crucial. This study presents a new longitudinal CT-based radiomics model to predict treatment response and prognosis in advanced HCC patients undergoing ICIs-based combination therapy.

methodsLongitudinal CT images were collected before and during the treatment for HCC patients across three institutions from January 2019 to April 2022. A total of 1316 radiomic features were extracted from arterial and portal venous phase abdominal CT images for each patient. A model called Longitudinal Whole-liver CT-based Radiomics (LWCTR) was developed to categorize patients into responders or non-responders using radiomic features and clinical information through support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. The area under the curve (AUC) was used as the performance metric and subsequently applied for risk stratification and prognostic assessment. The Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) method was used to calculate the Shapley value, which explains the contribution of each feature in the SVM model to the prediction.

resultsThis study included 395 eligible participants, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 51-66), comprising 344 males and 51 females. The LWCTR model performed well in predicting treatment response, achieving an AUC of 0.883 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.881-0.888) in the training cohort, 0.876 (0.858-0.895) in the internal validation cohort, and 0.875 (0.860-0.887) in the external test cohort. The Rad-Nomo model, integrating the LWCTR model's prediction score (Rad-score) with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), demonstrated strong prognostic performance. It achieved time-dependent AUC values of 0.902, 0.823, and 0.850 at 1, 2, and 3 years in the internal validation cohort and 0.893, 0.848, and 0.762 at the same intervals in the external test cohort.

conclusionThe proposed LWCTR model performs well in predicting treatment response and prognosis in patients with HCC receiving ICIs-based combination therapy, potentially contributing to personalized and timely treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLiver NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRadiomicsSupport Vector MachineTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsComputed tomographyHepatocellular carcinomaImmune checkpoint inhibitorMachine learningRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40181337
PMCPMC11967134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.