Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181332›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Evaluating the impact of AED training on nurses' emergency response capabilities in China: a cross-sectional survey.

Qingxiu Long, Zhenyu Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qingxiu LongEmergency Department of Guangyuan Central Hospital, No. 16 Jing Xiangzi, Lizhou District, Guangyuan, Sichuan, 628099, China. 357752932@qq.com.
Zhenyu LuoEmergency Department of Guangyuan Central Hospital, No. 16 Jing Xiangzi, Lizhou District, Guangyuan, Sichuan, 628099, China.

Funding

Guangyuan City Science and Technology Bureau No. 2021JDKP0049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutomated external defibrillators (AEDs) are critical in emergency cardiac care. However, significant gaps in nurses' knowledge and confidence in using AEDs limit their effectiveness. This study explores the current status of AED training and its impact on nurses' emergency response capabilities across municipal-level and county-level hospitals in China.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from May 20 to August 1, 2024, via telephone and electronic questionnaires in the emergency, intensive care unit (ICU), and general wards of 12 municipal and county-affiliated hospitals. A total of 451 questionnaires were distributed, with 440 valid responses (response rate: 97.6%). Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression in SPSS 24.0 (P < 0.05 considered significant). Key factors influencing AED knowledge and confidence included additional training, hands-on drills, and defibrillation experience.

resultsOnly 17.5% of nurses demonstrated sufficient AED knowledge, and 15.9% reported confidence in defibrillation. In municipal-level hospitals, nurses outperformed county hospitals in training access and proficiency. Additional training (OR = 24.50, p < 0.0001) and practical drills (OR = 12.36, p < 0.0001) were strongly associated with improved knowledge and confidence.

conclusionsThe study highlights the need for enhanced AED training, emphasizing practical drills and scenario-based simulations, particularly in resource-limited county hospitals. Targeted strategies could significantly improve nurses' emergency response capabilities, contributing to better cardiac arrest outcomes.

Indexed as

Automated external defibrillatorAutomated external defibrillator trainingConfidenceEmergency careKnowledge levelNurse

Identifiers

PMID40181332
PMCPMC11969696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.