ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Shifts in dominant tree species modulate phyllosphere microbial diversity and function in successional forests.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhyllosphere microbiome plays a crucial role in maintaining plant fitness. However, its response to changes in dominant tree species during forest succession still remains poorly understood.
methodsIn this study, microbial isolation and high-throughput sequencing techniques were used to analyze the community structure and diversity of phyllosphere microbes in pure Pinus massoniana forests, mixed P. massoniana and Liquidambar formosana forests, and pure L. formosana forests.
resultsThe results showed that the isolation rates of key plant fungal pathogens varied significantly in phyllosphere across forest types. In pure pine forest, Fusarium was most prevalent in pine needles, while in the mixed forest, Alternaria was dominant. For Liquidambar leaves, Phyllosticta dominated in pure forests, while Colletotrichum was prevalent in the mixed forests. Alpha diversity analysis revealed that higher microbial richness and diversity in the mixed forest compared to the pure forest. The bacterial community structure in Liquidambar leaves differed between the pure forest and the mixed forest. Co-occurrence networks confirmed more complex and stable microbial compositions and interactions in the mixed forest. Bacterial communities in pine needles exhibited higher functional capacity for methanotrophy and nitrogen fixation in the mixed forests.
conclusionsThe results demonstrate that the mixed forests foster greater microbial diversity, complexity, and functional potential in the phyllosphere compared to the pure forests, highlighting the importance of forest composition in shaping phyllosphere microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.