Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181283›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2026

Impact of Family Sociodemographics and Mother's Toothbrushing on Australian Preschool Children.

P Rajesh, D H Ha, L G Do, S K Tadakamadla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P RajeshSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-7166-4450
D H HaSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
L G DoSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3684-9949
S K TadakamadlaDentistry and Oral Health, Department of Rural Clinical Sciences, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the predictors of toothbrushing at the 2 distinct preschool age time points will help develop and implement effective strategies specific to children's age.

aimTo examine the effect of a family's sociodemographic status and mothers' oral health behavior on children's toothbrushing frequency at 2 different time points: 2 and 5 y of age.

designSecondary analysis (cross-sectional) of longitudinal data collected through a cohort study.

resultsIn children aged 2 y, the likelihood of toothbrushing twice or more per day was higher than their comparative counterparts if their mother's toothbrushing frequency was twice or more per day (odds ratio [OR]: 5.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.01-7.90), if they were girls (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.04-1.79), if the mother had completed tertiary education (OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01-2.19) or vocational training (OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.01-2.33), if the household had 2 adults (OR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.12-5.50) or 3 or more adults (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.06-5.97), if the total household income was >A$120,000/year (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.03-2.56), if the household had both parents (OR: 2.11; 95 % CI: 1.11-4.02). At the age of 5 y, girls whose mothers brushed their teeth twice or more per day were 1.43 (95 % CI: 1.02-2.02) and 10.53 (95% CI: 7.01-15.80) times more likely to brush their teeth more than twice or more per day than boys whose mothers brushed less than twice per day, respectively.

conclusionsChild sex and mother's toothbrushing were the 2 main factors associated with children's toothbrushing frequency at both ages. In addition, several sociodemographic factors were associated with toothbrushing frequency at 2 y of age.Knowledge Transfer Statement:The results of this study can be used by parents, especially mothers and policy makers, as they can help promote consistent toothbrushing habits in children. This is crucial as it is a preventive measure against oral health issues and cavities. In addition, the research can play a vital role in shaping policies to improve toothbrushing practices among children between the ages of 2 and 5 y.

Indexed as

MothersToothbrushingAdultAustraliaChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleOral HealthSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic Factorschilddental deviceshome caremothersoral hygienepreventive dentistry

Identifiers

PMID40181283
PMCPMC12967373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.