Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2025
After the program ends: HIV testing behavior among men who have sex when men after the conclusion of a program providing regular home delivery of HIV self-testing kits.
Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of HIV self-testing and associated factors among men who have sex with men in Chongqing, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Correction: After the program ends: HIV testing behavior among men who have sex with men after the conclusion of a program providing regular home delivery of HIV self-testing kits.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Testing for HIV continues to play a key role in prevention, especially among at-risk populations such as gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Incorporating HIV self-testing (HIVST) into testing programs encourages more frequent screening and likely facilitates earlier diagnosis, but little is known about how testing behavior changes after self-testing programs end. In this study, a subset of MSM in the eTest trial who were randomized to receive regular HIVST or clinic testing every three months for 12 months were followed for an additional 12 months. We compared testing rates during the intervention period to this 12-month post-intervention period. Results of a Poisson mixed model showed a significant condition by time interaction (IRR=0.91, SE=0.04, p=.019, %95CI=0.84-0.98). The average marginal predicted probability of testing in a given follow-up among controls was 30.4% during the intervention period and 28.2% post-intervention, versus 70.0% among HIVST condition participants during the intervention period but 23.6% by the end of the post-intervention period. Although regular mail delivery of HIVST increased HIV testing considerably while tests are actively being delivered, testing rates declined to a level similar to those who had not received HIVST after regular delivery stops. These results suggest that regularly delivering HIVST does not encourage longer-term regular testing habits in MSM who typically test infrequently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.