Trial reportBMC gastroenterology2025
A randomized open label pilot study evaluating the efficacy of two dosing regimens of rifamycin SV MMX in the treatment of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.
Trial report in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antibiotic therapy for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a systematic review of comparative efficacy, clinical-test discordance, and pediatric evidence gaps.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Treatment of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) in Gastrointestinal, Hepatic, Endocrine, Neurological, and Postoperative Diseases: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotics have demonstrated efficacy in the eradication of the underlying overgrowth bacteria and improvement of symptoms of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The use of standard antibiotics may cause intolerable side effects such as development of multidrug-resistant enteric bacteria, Clostridioides difficile infections and dysbiosis. Nonabsorbable antibiotics have the advantage of minimized side effects. Rifaximin, an antibiotic of the ansamycin class has been shown to be effective in the treatment of SIBO. We evaluated the use of another ansamycin antibiotic, rifamycin SV MMX (AEMCOLO) in the treatment of SIBO. One difference from rifaximin is the site of delivery of AEMCOLO which appears to be the distal small intestine and colon. Hence by maintaining the microbial milieu of the proximal small intestine, the clearance of the overgrowth bacteria might be enhanced. The side effect profile of Rifamycin SV MMX has been described elsewhere in the pivotal trials; there were no safety signals noted in this study. This randomized open label pilot study evaluated the efficacy of two dosing regimens of AEMCOLO in treating SIBO. We used a simple randomization method to assign participants into study groups. The participants included 31 patients, split between two treatment arms: one receiving the medication twice daily and the other - three times daily. The outcomes were assessed based on symptom improvement and breath test normalization. The results indicated a beneficial response with both dosing regimens leading to symptom improvement and breath test normalization. Further evaluation revealed that in the three-time daily regimen, greater symptomatic improvement was observed. For clinicians treating SIBO, this study suggests that AEMCOLO is a viable treatment option. A double-blind, placebo-controlled design will probably be necessary to ascertain the true efficacy of different dosing regimens of AEMCOLO in treating SIBO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.