ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Lateral recumbent position versus kneeling prone position combined with unprotected perineal delivery in natural childbirth: implication for clinical care.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPosture management significantly influences the natural childbirth process and the maternal experience. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of the lateral recumbent position versus the kneeling prone position combined with unprotected perineal delivery in natural childbirth, providing evidence-based support for clinical maternal care and posture management.
methodsThis research constitutes a retrospective cohort investigation, encompassing a period from January 2022 to December 2023, and focusing on women in labor who experienced childbirth at our medical facility. The study meticulously assessed and compared the characteristics and clinical outcomes of those who adopted the lateral recumbent position with those who utilized the kneeling prone position during the process of natural childbirth.
resultsA total of 168 women in labor were included, 86 women in labor underwent lateral recumbent position and 82 women in labor underwent kneeling prone position for natural childbirth. There were no statistical differences in first, second, third and total stage of labor between lateral recumbent position group and kneeling prone position group were found (all P > 0.05). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score after labor in lateral recumbent position group were statistically lower than that of kneeling prone position group(all P < 0.05). The lateral recumbent position reduced the likelihood of episiotomy and perineal edema, the severity of perineal lacerations compared with kneeling prone position for natural childbirth (all P < 0.05).
conclusionLateral recumbent position in natural childbirth offers the advantage of reducing perineal trauma, alleviating maternal pain and anxiety, and may be therefore deemed worthy of utilization in clinical maternal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.