SynthesisScientific reports2025
Tolerability of different doses of oliceridine versus traditional opioids in acute pain management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of oliceridine versus sufentanil in perioperative anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Multimodal Conscious Analgesia with Oliceridine and Alfentanil Plus Local Anesthesia in Revisional Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- Effect of oliceridine versus morphine on the quality of early recovery after thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Determination of the ED50 of Tegileridine and Comparison with Fentanyl for Analgesia During Hysteroscopy in Chinese Female Patients: An Exploratory Sequential Dose‑Finding Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Effect of Oliceridine Fumarate for Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia on Gastrointestinal Function in Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Oliceridine versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Women Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Double‑Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Effect of vaginal delivery history on oliceridine ED₅₀ combined with propofol during painless hysteroscopy: a modified Dixon sequential study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Oliceridine and Sufentanil in Total Laparoscopy Hysterectomy, a Clinical Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Oliceridine versus Sufentanil for Postoperative Recovery and Opioid-Related Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- ECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Determine of 90% Effective Dose of Oliceridine Combined with Etomidate for Inhibiting Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion Responses in Patients of Different Ages: A Biased-Coin Sequential Allocation Dose-Finding Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Novel Ligands for the Orphan Receptor GPR151 Modulate Morphine Action.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2026Article
- Effects of Oliceridine Versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Recovery Quality During Hysteroscopy Under Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesthesia: Protocol for a Single-Blind and Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Effects of oliceridine-based patient-controlled intravenous administration on postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Alcohol use disorder-associated pain: clinical and preclinical evidence.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to deliver a systematic review and meta-analysis to scrutinize the tolerability of different doses of oliceridine in acute pain patients. A comprehensive search was carried out in essential databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) for relevant studies up to the most recent available date.We included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared oliceridine with other interventions in acute pain management. Patients received an equi-analgesic dose of oliceridine relative to morphine, ensuring comparable Sum of Pain Intensity Differences (SPID-48 or SPID-24) or mean pain score reductions across groups. The initial loading dose was 1.5 mg for oliceridine and 4 mg for morphine, followed by demand doses via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). For oliceridine, the demand doses were 0.1, 0.35, or 0.5 mg, while for morphine, it was 1 mg.Utilizing the Review Manager 5.4, data on nausea, vomiting, sedation, dizziness, pruritus, and hypoxemia were assembled and evaluated.We conducted sensitivity analyses to confirm the robustness of our findings. The preliminary search discovered 710 potential studies. Having gone through a careful screening process, a total of 7 RCTs met our inclusion benchmarks. Five distinct publications analyzed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). According to our meta-analysis findings, patients assigned to the oliceridine group experienced a notably lower rate of postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV) compared to the morphine group (PON: RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.74, P < 0.001; POV: RR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.28-0.47, P < 0.001). Data from 4 documents examined sedation and dizziness. Our findings demonstrate that oliceridine recipients had a significant decline in the incidence of both sedation and dizziness (sedation: RR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.91, P = 0.01; dizziness: RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.88, P = 0.002).Moreover, the oliceridine group recorded a lower incident of hypoxemia showcasing a favorable safety profile (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.41-0.65, P < 0.001).Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. The systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that oliceridine is a well-tolerated and safe intravenous analgesic for acute pain patients, often reducing the incidence of adverse events in comparison to morphine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.