ReviewGene therapy2025
Is dystrophin immunogenicity a barrier to advancing gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
Review in Gene therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic upregulation of gene expression in inherited cardiomyopathies from current approaches to future directions.Nature cardiovascular research · 2026Review
- Immunogenicity in Approved Adeno-Associated Virus-Based Gene Therapies: A Framework for a Tailored Assessment Strategy.The AAPS journal · 2026Review
- Article
- From molecular correction to functional rescue: delivery, tissue state, and immunobiology as the principal constraints on dystrophin-restoring therapy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Obestatin treatment links mitochondrial homeostasis and skeletal muscle repair in Duchenne muscle dystrophy.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Article
- Dendritic cell maturation assay for non-clinical immunogenicity risk assessment: best practices recommended by the European Immunogenicity Platform.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a neuromuscular disorder that leads to severe disability and premature death in young men. As DMD is caused by the absence of dystrophin, therapeutic development has focused on strategies to restore dystrophin expression. These include readthrough of premature stop codons, exon skipping to restore the reading frame, and gene therapy. The first two methods are mutation-specific, benefiting only subsets of patients, whereas gene therapy could treat all individuals with DMD. Immunogenicity of dystrophin may challenge these efforts. The immune system can recognize dystrophin as a neo-antigen, just as it can recognize newly arising antigens present on mutated cells. An in-depth evaluation of anti-dystrophin immune response as a factor affecting the treatment effectiveness is needed. Key questions include the underlying mechanisms of immunity induction by antigenic epitopes of the re-expressed dystrophin, the impact of such responses on the therapeutic efficacy, and the role of patient-specific risk factors, such as preimmunization due to revertant fibres, chronic muscle inflammation, pre-existing T lymphocytes reactive to dystrophin, which avoided deletion in dystrophic thymus, or antigen cross-reactivity. Patients' immune status assessment before treatment may help mitigating anti-dystrophin responses. Exploring potential therapeutic strategies to enhance treatment outcomes is also essential: Since DMD can be diagnosed at birth, early dystrophin re-expression could prevent damage and also potentially induce neonatal tolerance. In older patients, carefully managed immunosuppression and tolerogenic protocols could pave the way for more successful dystrophin replacement therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.