ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of melatonin on passive, ex-vivo biomechanical behavior of lamb esophagus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the purposes of tissue engineering is to offer therapeutic alternatives to treat various esophagus-related diseases. To develop viable esophageal replacements that are both mechanically and biologically compatible and to assess the impact of pharmacological treatments on esophageal tissue at the macro- and micro-structural levels, it is crucial to understand the biomechanical properties of the esophagus. In this study, we analyzed esophageal tissue samples from nine newborn lambs. Subjects were randomly separated into a control group (n = 5) and a melatonin-treated group (n = 4). The passive mechanical response of the esophagus was studied by performing in-vitro uniaxial tensile tests along longitudinal and circumferential directions. Samples were classified into three types: internal tissue (mucosa and submucosa layers), external tissue (external muscular layer), and integrated tissue (comprising all layers). Uniaxial stress versus stretch curves of each classification were used to determine mechanical properties that were statistically analyzed. Moreover, average experimental results were used to calibrate an anisotropic hyperelastic model. Stress-stretch curves from uniaxial tests showed a highly anisotropic behavior, with a higher stiffness along the longitudinal direction and internal tissue exhibiting the highest stiffness. To contrast the results obtained from mechanical testing, histological analysis of esophagus samples was carried out. Microstructural components were quantified and morphological measurements of the main zones were performed. No significant differences were found at the macro- and microstructural levels of the tissue, indicating that the supply of low doses of melatonin does not alter the biomechanical properties of the esophagus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.