ArticleCommunications biology2025
Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying action tool knowledge tasks: specificity of tool-tool compared to hand-tool compatibility tasks.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03555162 (Cerebral Bases of Tool Use and Tool Evolution), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cerebral Bases of Tool Use and Tool Evolution
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel tool use does not depend on mechanical reasoning: evidence from apraxia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Limb apraxia and active inference in the visuomotor pathways.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Action tool knowledge can be assessed mainly with two kinds of tasks: tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks. While these tasks are used to assess action tool knowledge, recent data showed striking dissociations between these tasks in brain-damaged patients. In this study, we explored the neuropsychological dissociations (Experiment 1; 60 brain-damaged patients) and the potential cognitive mechanisms engaged during these two tasks (Experiment 2; 52 healthy participants). Finally, we also reanalyzed fMRI data to investigate the neural bases engaged in tool-tool and hand-tool compatibility tasks (Experiment 3; 34 healthy participants). The three experiments provide convergent arguments by showing that both tasks share common core computations supported by a left-lateralized brain network, but hand-tool compatibility task engages regions outside of this brain network and is explained by visual imagery while tool-tool task is rather explained by motor imagery. Our results shed a new light on action tool knowledge tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.