Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181131›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Beyond boundaries: extended temporal flexibility in synaptic tagging and capture.

Yee Song Chong, Sheila Ruixia Ang, Sreedharan Sajikumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yee Song ChongDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-8585
Sheila Ruixia AngDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sreedharan SajikumarDepartment of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. phssks@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-8982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic tagging and capture (STC) is a mechanism that enables the formation of associative synaptic plasticity by marking activated synapses with "tags" to capture plasticity-related products (PRPs) essential for plasticity stabilization. Experimental evidence using long-term potentiation (LTP), a widely studied cellular correlate of memory, shows that the duration of synaptic tags varies, lasting up to 90 minutes in ex vivo hippocampal slices but shorter in in vivo conditions, likely due to higher metabolic activity. In this study, we investigate the time window for tag-PRP interactions in STC using a strong-before-weak paradigm, where protein synthesis-dependent late-LTP precedes protein synthesis-independent early-LTP at various intervals. Surprisingly, successful STC is observed even with a 9-hour interval in the strong-before-weak paradigm, suggesting a broader temporal flexibility for tag-PRP interactions than previously understood. This unexpected finding offers alternative explanations for associative memory formation by cataloguing memory events, allowing weaker memories to be strengthened when preceded by stronger ones.

Indexed as

HippocampusLong-Term PotentiationNeuronal PlasticitySynapsesAnimalsMaleMemoryRatsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID40181131
PMCPMC11968991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.