ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the diagnostic potential of plasma circ-CCDC66 in colorectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- CSDPCDA: A miRNA-Mediated Cross-Semantic Regulatory Network Framework for Predicting circRNA-Disease Associations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Hsa_circ_0002103 promotes progression of colorectal cancer via miR-193a-3p/CCND1 axis.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal adenoma: The emerging potential of blood-based biomarkers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Novel Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Extracellular vesicles-delivered circDB promotes ischemic muscle repair through the miR-34a/USP7/Notch1 signaling pathway.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Owing to the subtle symptoms and low sensitivity of colorectal cancer (CRC), such as rectal bleeding, anemia, and abdominal pain, CRC generally occurs in late stages. This leads to delayed diagnosis and reduced treatment efficiency. Therefore, novel and effective CRC markers are needed. In this study, we conducted circRNA expression profiling on GSE datasets and identified circ-CCDC66 as a potential marker. Through qPCR analysis of plasma samples from 50 CRC patients, 50 with colorectal polyps, and 50 healthy individuals, circ-CCDC66 emerged as a promising biomarker for CRC detection capable of identifying polyps among healthy individuals. Furthermore, plasma circ-CCDC66 levels exhibited superior diagnostic accuracy, with an AUC of 0.920, compared to traditional markers, such as serum CEA and CA19-9. Remarkably, the combined detection of circ-CCDC66, CEA, and CA19-9 further increased the AUC for distinguishing the colorectal polyps' group from the healthy control group to 0.991, with sensitivity and specificity increasing to 98% and 96%, respectively. Additionally, a circ-CCDC66-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network was established to provide insight into how circ-CCDC66 influences CRC pathways. This pioneering study highlights circ-CCDC66's clinical relevance as a blood-based diagnostic marker for CRC and offers valuable insights into future developments in the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.