Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40181126›Full record

ArticleNature materials2025

The influence of pressure on lithium dealloying in solid-state and liquid electrolyte batteries.

Congcheng Wang, Yuhgene Liu, Won Joon Jeong, Timothy Chen, Mu Lu, Douglas Lars Nelson, Elif Pınar Alsaç, Sun Geun Yoon, Kelsey Anne Cavallaro, Sazol Das and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. General Prelithiation Approaches and the Corresponding Full Cell Design.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Design Principles for Alloy-Anode-Based Low-Stack-Pressure Solid-State Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prelithiation of Alloy Anodes via Roll Pressing for Solid-State Batteries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. ACS nano · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Congcheng WangGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-2310
Yuhgene LiuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Won Joon JeongSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8877-9671
Timothy ChenGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8308-0223
Mu LuGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Douglas Lars NelsonSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-0547
Elif Pınar AlsaçGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sun Geun YoonGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kelsey Anne CavallaroSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sazol DasNovelis Inc., Kennesaw, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7369-296X
Diptarka MajumdarNovelis Inc., Kennesaw, GA, USA.
Rajesh GopalaswamyNovelis Inc., Kennesaw, GA, USA.
Shuman XiaGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Matthew T McDowellGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. mattmcdowell@gatech.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5552-3456

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2209202, 2025462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dealloying reactions underpin the operation of next-generation battery electrodes and are also a synthesis route for porous metals, but the influence of mechanical stress on these processes is not well understood. Here we investigate how the applied stack pressure affects structural evolution and electrochemical reversibility during the alloying/dealloying of Li alloy materials (Li-Al, Li-Sn, Li-In and Li-Si) using solid-state and liquid electrolytes. The extent of porosity formation during the dealloying of metals is found to be universally governed by stack pressure, with pressures of at least 20% of the yield strength required to achieve ~80% relative density. This concept is correlated to the cycling of alloy electrodes in solid-state batteries, with a yield-strength-dependent threshold pressure needed for reversible high Li-storage capacity due to densification. With this understanding, we design Al and Si anodes with a densified interfacial layer enabling stable cycling at low stack pressures (2 MPa), providing guidance towards practical high-energy solid-state batteries.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.