ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the impact of pretreatment and particle size variation on properties of rubberized concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of Fine and Coarse Waste Tyre Rubber Aggregates on the Workability, Mechanical Properties and Rubber-Paste Interface of Concrete: An SEM/EDX Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study comprises the influence of particle sizes of discarded tire rubber with and without pre-treatment to check the hardened properties of rubberized concrete (RC) in analogy to control concrete. Fine aggregates from concrete are volumetrically substituted using untreated and pre-treated rubber particles of three different sizes up to 20% in part, with an increment of 5%. Pre-treatment using two different pre-treatment methods i.e., sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and silica fume and NaOH was adopted. Properties of fresh concrete-i.e., density, workability, and toughened concrete strengths as compressive, flexural, and indirect tensile strengths were assessed with the control concrete. Along with these, unconventional properties like cylindrical compressive strength and abrasion, resistance to impact, and water absorption are compared. The mechanical properties of RC were found to be similar to conventional concrete, as the compressive strength for RC with pretreated rubber fibers up to 10% obtained was 61.5 MPa while flexural and split tensile strength was above 5.6 MPa. The abrasion resistance was obtained for RC with rubber fibers from 0.98 to 1.46 mm up to 20% substitution against 1.34 mm of control concrete. Modified concrete with pre-treated rubber particles showed better performance than concrete with untreated rubber particles with coarser sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.