ArticleScientific reports2025
An interpretable deep learning model for the accurate prediction of mean fragmentation size in blasting operations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-blast prediction of ground vibration in surface mining using rock acoustic impedance and wave attenuation calibrated with in-situ measurements.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Statistical prediction method of inclined shaft blasting fragmentation based on dynamic damage distribution in excavated rock mass.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fragmentation size is an important indicator for evaluating blasting effectiveness. To address the limitations of conventional blasting fragmentation size prediction methods in terms of prediction accuracy and applicability, this study proposes an NRBO-CNN-LSSVM model for predicting mean fragmentation size, which integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Least Squares Support Vector Machines (LSSVM), and the Newton-Raphson Optimizer (NRBO). The study is based on a database containing 105 samples derived from both previous research and field collection. Additionally, several machine learning prediction models, including CNN-LSSVM, CNN, LSSVM, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Support Vector Regression (SVR), are developed for comparative analysis. The results showed that the NRBO-CNN-LSSVM model achieved remarkable prediction accuracy on the training dataset, with a coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.